Call Today for a FREE Consultation

262-923-8761

24 HOUR EMERGENCY CONTACT

Sex crime laws sometimes result in disproportionate sentencing

| Nov 26, 2013 | Sex Crimes

The criminal justice system was intended to provide relatively uniform and proportional responses to various crimes based on their severity and other factors such as the intentions of the alleged criminal. Though most criminal offenders are held accountable by punishments proportional to the infractions they have committed, sex offenders are too often subjected to disparate punishments.

Sex crimes and those who commit them are particularly reviled by the public. Moreover, many sex crimes laws are passed in response to truly horrific incidents. Together, these factors can result in the passage of sex offense legislation that is inconsistent with the aims of the criminal justice system and inconsistent with more reasonable pieces of sex crime legislation. A recent case from here in Wisconsin highlights this issue.

Recently, a 56-year-old Wisconsin man was charged with using a computer to facilitate a child sex crime. The man allegedly placed an ad on Craigslist looking to have a sexual liason. Police had set up a sting operation and say that the defendant thought he would be meeting a 15-year-old boy. When he arrived at the agreed-upon meeting place, he was arrested. 

The charge of using a computer to facilitate a child sex crime is considered a Class C felony for which a convicted offender could face a maximum of 25 years in prison and 15 years of supervised release. Second-degree sexual assault is also considered a Class C felony and carries the same potential sentence. 

Here is where things get complicated. In 2012, a law took effect that imposes a five-year mandatory minimum prison sentence on anyone convicted of using a computer to facilitate a child sex crime. However, the same mandatory minimum does not apply to sexual assault. 

This creates an illogical double standard. If convicted, the defendant would face at least five years in prison for a crime that (in this case) did not actually involve sex with a minor. However, if the man had actually sexually assaulted a minor (and been charged with sexual assault), he may have faced a much lighter sentence than five years in prison.

The defendant’s attorney filed a motion to have the charge dropped, arguing that it violates the Constitutional right to equal protection. Unfortunately, a judge denied the motion.

To be clear, there is no debate about the defendant’s supposed guilt or innocence. Rather, the dispute stems from the idea that the crime the man is charged with carries a harsher minimum sentence than sexual assault, which is arguably a worse crime in many cases. 

Is this fair or should it be changed? What do readers think?

Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, “Milwaukee County judge denies man’s challenge to sex sting law,” Bruce Vielmetti, Nov. 25, 2013

Archives

“I just want to say thank you for the outstanding work you have done for him and let you know how much we appreciate the time and attention you gave to his case. We are obviously overjoyed by today’s dismissal!” (Child pornography case dismissed after motion to suppress was granted)”

“After having had time to exhale, we thank each one of you and all the others who contributed to the exemplary Supreme Court presentation. We are proud of your efforts on our behalf and, equally important, on behalf of the many present and future defendants statewide.” (Client’s comment after Supreme Court oral argument)

“Thank you. Thank you. I am so pleased to hear that we won. It doesn’t seem that it was even a close call. I appreciate your efforts.” (Oconto County defendant after Buting, Williams & Stilling got his prison sentence overturned in the court of appeals) ”

“Your time and advice was appreciated more than words can express at a time when we really needed someone to guide us.” (Client)

“The outcome was amazing, one unavailable even under identical circumstances in probably 98 percent of federal courtrooms around the country. Separate and apart from the outcome, though, I am supremely impressed by your efforts on your client’s behalf. Your comments in support of the requested sentence were perfect in tone and, having now reviewed the extensive sentencing memorandum you filed, your work in that regard was exemplary as well. Your client was certainly fortunate to have you as his attorney.” (Local federal court attorney present at a sentencing)

“I can’t thank you enough, not only for all of the tireless work that you and your staff put into my case, but for telling me what I needed to hear, at a time when I absolutely had to hear it. I consider myself blessed for everything turning out the way it did, especially since I blindly picked you out of a phone book! You helped me, my family and friends in many more ways than the money ever could.” (Child pornography client)

“I think you will find that in any circles where Kathy’s name is raised, people will always respond positively and identify her as an extremely hardworking, knowledgeable and ethical lawyer who is timely and effective with any endeavor she takes on. These circles would include colleagues, friends, prosecutors, judges, professors and others who have crossed paths with Kathy. They would also include the many lawyers like me who have referred numerous cases to Kathy, invariably with positive feedback from the clients regarding her knowledge of their case, empathy, professionalism and fair-mindedness in addressing their concerns.” (Fellow attorney)

“Thank you for giving [our son] back to us. Wonderful work!” (Family of client accused of armed robbery after charges were dismissed)

“Yes, His perfect time and perfect place, you were a part of this plan. I almost didn’t hire you, but I took a step of faith trusting Him and look what happened? Praise God. Our Lord put you in your vocation for a reason, continue to help those He brings your way. May He bless you in ALL you do!” (Client who was wrongfully convicted of sexual assault in a northwestern Wisconsin county. He was released from prison after attorneys got his conviction reversed.)

“I really cannot thank you enough for your past help. You really know your stuff. It is actually funny when I think about my other past attorney’s knowledge and then when I talk with you. It’s like night and day. You’re like a walking book of knowledge with a purpose-driven life. Thanks.” (Brown County client of attorney Buting)

“A year later and I still believe your defense is the single best example of lawyering I have ever seen.” (Television reporter commenting on attorney Buting’s defense of Steven Avery)

“You have a certain brilliance that makes me sure that when you talk, it is good information and I am in good hands. You tell it to me like it is even when the things you say are not always the things that I would like to hear. You keep it REAL!!!” (Brown County client)

“Thank you, thank you, thank you! I feel like this was one of the biggest blessings that happened in my life. I put this along with my children being born healthy and when I survived that horrific shooting. I appreciate everything you have done for me. I couldn’t ask for better lawyers. I want to say thank you to everybody at your firm. I owe you more than the fee you so rightfully deserve. … You gave me back hope. Thank you, man! Out of my 36 years … I have never seen such kindness before. I don’t know what I did to deserve this; I’m very thankful nonetheless. Thank you for giving me hope again. Thank you for your generosity. There are still some really good people around.” (Federal criminal appeal client)

“There is no other attorney I’ve ever even heard of I’d rather have as chief counsel and leader of my defense/appeals than Jerome Buting. You’re the best. Period.” (Dane County client)

“Your advice and counsel were greatly appreciated. We appreciate you taking the time on your Sunday and evenings to help us. We are SO happy about the results! Thanks again.” (Waukesha County client)

“Thank you again … for everything. Five and one-half years of commitment, so many ups and downs and an outcome like that. You did a GREAT job.” (Waukesha County felony drug offense client)