Call Today for a free Consultation
262-923-8761 24 Hour Emergency Contact

SCOTUS ruling: Cop gets law wrong but defendant pays the price

Last week, we wrote about challenging the lawfulness of a traffic stop, which is one option for defending against DUI charges. An officer must have a reasonable suspicion that a crime or violation has occurred if he wants to pull over a driver. This is often based on erratic driving that could indicate alcohol impairment or an observed problem with the vehicle that violates Wisconsin safety laws.

Unfortunately, the U.S. Supreme Court recently delivered a ruling that criminal defense advocates view as an unfair double standard. Ignorance of the law is almost never a viable excuse for citizens charged with a crime, but apparently it is a valid excuse for police officers who make erroneous traffic stops.

The case concerned a 2009 traffic stop in North Carolina. An officer pulled over a car with two men in it because one of the car’s brake lights was broken. The officer mistakenly thought that this was a safety violation. However, North Carolina law requires only one working brake light.

Nonetheless, the stop was initiated and the officer eventually conducted a search of the vehicle. A bag of cocaine was discovered and the vehicle’s owner was charged with attempted drug trafficking.

The case was appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, where justices ruled 8-1 that the vehicle search was legal. The majority opinion stated that the search was not a violation of the defendant’s Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure, because the officer’s mistake was reasonable.

But who gets to decide what is and is not “reasonable?” Moreover, it is doubtful that the average citizen would be granted the same leeway if he broke a law that he reasonably misunderstood.

Thankfully, at least one Supreme Court justice dissented. Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued that the ruling “means further eroding the Fourth Amendment’s protection of civil liberties in a context where that protection has already been worn down.” She also added that it could create even more distrust between citizens and police.

Source: The New York Times, “Court Rules for a Mistaken Police Officer,” Adam Liptak, Dec. 15, 2014

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Choosing the Right Lawyer Buting for the Defense In The News

Our Office

Brookfield Office
400 N. Executive Drive
Suite 205
Brookfield, WI 53005

Phone: 262-923-8761
Phone: 262-821-0999
Fax: 262-821-5599
Map & Directions

Glendale Office
6165 North Green Bay Avenue
Glendale, WI 53209

Map & Directions

How Can
We Help You?


Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

This site uses Google's Invisible reCAPTCHA, which is subject to Google's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Email Us For A Response
Back To Top payment