Call Today for a FREE Consultation

262-923-8761

24 HOUR EMERGENCY CONTACT

Court: Border agents need reasonable suspicion to search devices

| Nov 22, 2019 | Criminal Defense

At the border and in international airports, ICE and the Customs and Border Protection service have been routinely rifling through people’s computers and smart phones. Away from the border, law enforcement needs a warrant before it can search your phone or another electronic device. So why have border agents assumed they didn’t need one?

The ACLU and the Electronic Frontier Foundation sued on behalf of 11 international travelers who had had their devices searched at the border without a warrant. In their defense, the border agencies claimed that their “paramount” interest in protecting the border gave them wide latitude in routine searches.

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures by government agents, and it still applies at the border, a federal judge ruled in the case.

The judge recognized that the border agencies do have a “paramount” interest in protecting the border, that interest does not completely defeat all Fourth Amendment concerns. Among those concerns is the privacy of innocent travelers in the information contained in their phones and computers.

Therefore, she ruled that the policies by ICE and the CPB allowing routine searches of electronic devices are unconstitutional.

Border agents will need cause, but not a warrant

The judge did not rule, however, that border agents need warrants before they can search electronic devices at the border. She recognized that there are security concerns at the border that do not exist elsewhere in society.

Therefore, the judge ruled that border agents need “reasonable suspicion” before they can search your phone or computer. Reasonable suspicion must be both reasonable and articulable, meaning that a law enforcement agent must be able to point to objective facts that imply the person could be involved in criminal activity. Suspicion is not reasonable when it is based on a mere hunch or on racial profiling, for example.

That’s important because minorities and others could be unfairly targeted by searches unless there are standards in place to prevent that. Several of the plaintiffs in the case are religious or ethnic minorities, along with journalists and people who might have been carrying protected information in their phones or computers.

“By putting an end to the government’s ability to conduct suspicionless fishing expeditions, the court reaffirms that the border is not a lawless place and that we don’t lose our privacy rights when we travel,” said one of the ACLU attorneys.

You should be aware that the number of electronic device searches at the border has ballooned in the last few years under the Trump administration. According to the ACLU, in 2015 there were approximately 8,500 border searches of electronic devices. Last year, there were over 30,000.

Archives

“I just want to say thank you for the outstanding work you have done for him and let you know how much we appreciate the time and attention you gave to his case. We are obviously overjoyed by today’s dismissal!” (Child pornography case dismissed after motion to suppress was granted)”

“After having had time to exhale, we thank each one of you and all the others who contributed to the exemplary Supreme Court presentation. We are proud of your efforts on our behalf and, equally important, on behalf of the many present and future defendants statewide.” (Client’s comment after Supreme Court oral argument)

“Thank you. Thank you. I am so pleased to hear that we won. It doesn’t seem that it was even a close call. I appreciate your efforts.” (Oconto County defendant after Buting, Williams & Stilling got his prison sentence overturned in the court of appeals) ”

“Your time and advice was appreciated more than words can express at a time when we really needed someone to guide us.” (Client)

“The outcome was amazing, one unavailable even under identical circumstances in probably 98 percent of federal courtrooms around the country. Separate and apart from the outcome, though, I am supremely impressed by your efforts on your client’s behalf. Your comments in support of the requested sentence were perfect in tone and, having now reviewed the extensive sentencing memorandum you filed, your work in that regard was exemplary as well. Your client was certainly fortunate to have you as his attorney.” (Local federal court attorney present at a sentencing)

“I can’t thank you enough, not only for all of the tireless work that you and your staff put into my case, but for telling me what I needed to hear, at a time when I absolutely had to hear it. I consider myself blessed for everything turning out the way it did, especially since I blindly picked you out of a phone book! You helped me, my family and friends in many more ways than the money ever could.” (Child pornography client)

“I think you will find that in any circles where Kathy’s name is raised, people will always respond positively and identify her as an extremely hardworking, knowledgeable and ethical lawyer who is timely and effective with any endeavor she takes on. These circles would include colleagues, friends, prosecutors, judges, professors and others who have crossed paths with Kathy. They would also include the many lawyers like me who have referred numerous cases to Kathy, invariably with positive feedback from the clients regarding her knowledge of their case, empathy, professionalism and fair-mindedness in addressing their concerns.” (Fellow attorney)

“Thank you for giving [our son] back to us. Wonderful work!” (Family of client accused of armed robbery after charges were dismissed)

“Yes, His perfect time and perfect place, you were a part of this plan. I almost didn’t hire you, but I took a step of faith trusting Him and look what happened? Praise God. Our Lord put you in your vocation for a reason, continue to help those He brings your way. May He bless you in ALL you do!” (Client who was wrongfully convicted of sexual assault in a northwestern Wisconsin county. He was released from prison after attorneys got his conviction reversed.)

“I really cannot thank you enough for your past help. You really know your stuff. It is actually funny when I think about my other past attorney’s knowledge and then when I talk with you. It’s like night and day. You’re like a walking book of knowledge with a purpose-driven life. Thanks.” (Brown County client of attorney Buting)

“A year later and I still believe your defense is the single best example of lawyering I have ever seen.” (Television reporter commenting on attorney Buting’s defense of Steven Avery)

“You have a certain brilliance that makes me sure that when you talk, it is good information and I am in good hands. You tell it to me like it is even when the things you say are not always the things that I would like to hear. You keep it REAL!!!” (Brown County client)

“Thank you, thank you, thank you! I feel like this was one of the biggest blessings that happened in my life. I put this along with my children being born healthy and when I survived that horrific shooting. I appreciate everything you have done for me. I couldn’t ask for better lawyers. I want to say thank you to everybody at your firm. I owe you more than the fee you so rightfully deserve. … You gave me back hope. Thank you, man! Out of my 36 years … I have never seen such kindness before. I don’t know what I did to deserve this; I’m very thankful nonetheless. Thank you for giving me hope again. Thank you for your generosity. There are still some really good people around.” (Federal criminal appeal client)

“There is no other attorney I’ve ever even heard of I’d rather have as chief counsel and leader of my defense/appeals than Jerome Buting. You’re the best. Period.” (Dane County client)

“Your advice and counsel were greatly appreciated. We appreciate you taking the time on your Sunday and evenings to help us. We are SO happy about the results! Thanks again.” (Waukesha County client)

“Thank you again … for everything. Five and one-half years of commitment, so many ups and downs and an outcome like that. You did a GREAT job.” (Waukesha County felony drug offense client)