brand logo

Call Today for a FREE Consultation

262-923-8761

24 HOUR EMERGENCY CONTACT

Do jurors fall for the ‘CSI effect’?

| Mar 26, 2021 | Challenging DNA Evidence

Forensic science isn’t nearly as straightforward and foolproof as it seems on television crime shows like “CSI: Crime Scene Investigation.” Unfortunately, many jurors may not know that. Are they expecting results like those produced on the show? Can they disregard their crime show biases?

Two law professors recently looked into whether the so-called “CSI effect” is real. How much scientific flair are the participants in court cases expecting? Are they disappointed when the forensic evidence they see is boringly inconclusive?

Many common forensic techniques are far from foolproof, after all. As we’ve discussed before on this blog, a seminal 2016 report by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology found that feature-comparison methods like bitemark analysis, hair analysis and latent fingerprint analysis lack sufficient scientific underpinnings. For example, little research has actually been done to confirm that every set of fingerprints is different.

The report also found that forensic analysts frequently overstate the certainty of their findings when testifying about feature-comparison methods. Only DNA analysis can be used to demonstrate a connection between a suspect and a crime scene, and that is only when the process is set up properly and the tests are performed accurately.

The two law professors sent surveys to a group of lawyers and a group of laypeople asking how they viewed this type of evidence. The idea was to discover whether these groups of people are affected by the seeming certainty of scientific evidence as presented by “CSI.”

The lawyers were somewhat skeptical of fingerprint evidence. Most of them characterized this type of evidence as “somewhat-to-very reliable,” with over 30% characterizing it as “somewhat-to-very unreliable.”

The general public was much less skeptical. 97% of the lay survey respondents reported holding the belief that fingerprints are always unique.

Interestingly, the general public was more skeptical of DNA evidence as being unique to each individual. Only 91.57% thought so.

The lawyers were even more skeptical. Only 78.4% of attorneys surveyed thought DNA was unique to each individual.

In both cases, the lawyers were asked to gauge what the laypeople were likely to think. Each time, the attorneys estimated that the laypeople would be less skeptical than the lay survey respondents actually were.

That said, most jurors do enter the courtroom believing that DNA and fingerprints yield results that are at least somewhat reliable and possibly nearly infallible.

What will this mean when the time comes to challenge the validity of one of these scientific tests?

Archives

FindLaw Network

“I just want to say thank you for the outstanding work you have done for him and let you know how much we appreciate the time and attention you gave to his case. We are obviously overjoyed by today’s dismissal!” (Child pornography case dismissed after motion to suppress was granted)”

“After having had time to exhale, we thank each one of you and all the others who contributed to the exemplary Supreme Court presentation. We are proud of your efforts on our behalf and, equally important, on behalf of the many present and future defendants statewide.” (Client’s comment after Supreme Court oral argument)

“Thank you. Thank you. I am so pleased to hear that we won. It doesn’t seem that it was even a close call. I appreciate your efforts.” (Oconto County defendant after Buting, Williams & Stilling got his prison sentence overturned in the court of appeals) ”

“Your time and advice was appreciated more than words can express at a time when we really needed someone to guide us.” (Client)

“The outcome was amazing, one unavailable even under identical circumstances in probably 98 percent of federal courtrooms around the country. Separate and apart from the outcome, though, I am supremely impressed by your efforts on your client’s behalf. Your comments in support of the requested sentence were perfect in tone and, having now reviewed the extensive sentencing memorandum you filed, your work in that regard was exemplary as well. Your client was certainly fortunate to have you as his attorney.” (Local federal court attorney present at a sentencing)

“I can’t thank you enough, not only for all of the tireless work that you and your staff put into my case, but for telling me what I needed to hear, at a time when I absolutely had to hear it. I consider myself blessed for everything turning out the way it did, especially since I blindly picked you out of a phone book! You helped me, my family and friends in many more ways than the money ever could.” (Child pornography client)

“I think you will find that in any circles where Kathy’s name is raised, people will always respond positively and identify her as an extremely hardworking, knowledgeable and ethical lawyer who is timely and effective with any endeavor she takes on. These circles would include colleagues, friends, prosecutors, judges, professors and others who have crossed paths with Kathy. They would also include the many lawyers like me who have referred numerous cases to Kathy, invariably with positive feedback from the clients regarding her knowledge of their case, empathy, professionalism and fair-mindedness in addressing their concerns.” (Fellow attorney)

“Thank you for giving [our son] back to us. Wonderful work!” (Family of client accused of armed robbery after charges were dismissed)

“Yes, His perfect time and perfect place, you were a part of this plan. I almost didn’t hire you, but I took a step of faith trusting Him and look what happened? Praise God. Our Lord put you in your vocation for a reason, continue to help those He brings your way. May He bless you in ALL you do!” (Client who was wrongfully convicted of sexual assault in a northwestern Wisconsin county. He was released from prison after attorneys got his conviction reversed.)

“I really cannot thank you enough for your past help. You really know your stuff. It is actually funny when I think about my other past attorney’s knowledge and then when I talk with you. It’s like night and day. You’re like a walking book of knowledge with a purpose-driven life. Thanks.” (Brown County client of attorney Buting)

“A year later and I still believe your defense is the single best example of lawyering I have ever seen.” (Television reporter commenting on attorney Buting’s defense of Steven Avery)

“You have a certain brilliance that makes me sure that when you talk, it is good information and I am in good hands. You tell it to me like it is even when the things you say are not always the things that I would like to hear. You keep it REAL!!!” (Brown County client)

“Thank you, thank you, thank you! I feel like this was one of the biggest blessings that happened in my life. I put this along with my children being born healthy and when I survived that horrific shooting. I appreciate everything you have done for me. I couldn’t ask for better lawyers. I want to say thank you to everybody at your firm. I owe you more than the fee you so rightfully deserve. … You gave me back hope. Thank you, man! Out of my 36 years … I have never seen such kindness before. I don’t know what I did to deserve this; I’m very thankful nonetheless. Thank you for giving me hope again. Thank you for your generosity. There are still some really good people around.” (Federal criminal appeal client)

“There is no other attorney I’ve ever even heard of I’d rather have as chief counsel and leader of my defense/appeals than Jerome Buting. You’re the best. Period.” (Dane County client)

“Your advice and counsel were greatly appreciated. We appreciate you taking the time on your Sunday and evenings to help us. We are SO happy about the results! Thanks again.” (Waukesha County client)

“Thank you again … for everything. Five and one-half years of commitment, so many ups and downs and an outcome like that. You did a GREAT job.” (Waukesha County felony drug offense client)