Buting ,Williams & Stilling ,S.C. | A Criminal Defense Law Firm

Call Today for a FREE Consultation

262-923-8761

24 HOUR EMERGENCY CONTACT

Wisconsin Supreme Court to decide on phone searches and seizures

On Behalf of | Mar 30, 2021 | Criminal Appeals

Police in Wisconsin and in all 50 states are using mobile forensic tools to copy the entire contents of cellphones. While the law generally requires a search warrant before a cellphone can be searched, this technology allows the entire phone to be recorded and saved for later searches, if desired.

Should the police be allowed to make a copy of your phone, use it at their leisure, and share it with other law enforcement agencies? A case currently before the Wisconsin Supreme Court could decide.

In this particular case, State v. Burch, a man was initially suspected of being the driver in a hit-and-run accident because he had previously driven the car involved. In order to back up his alibi, he allowed a Green Bay officer to review his text messages.

Although Mr. Burch only consented to have his texts reviewed, the officer in fact copied the entire cellphone onto a forensic device and filed it away. Later, the department officially ruled Mr. Burch out as a suspect in the hit-and-run.

You might expect that the contents of the cellphone would be discarded at that point, but they were not. Instead, when the Brown County Sheriff’s Office came across Mr. Burch as a suspect in a homicide, it learned that Green Bay had a copy of his phone. Brown County received a copy, as well, and found evidence linking Mr. Burch to the crime.

Mr. Burch was convicted but argued that the evidence from his cellphone was obtained illegally because no warrant was obtained and his consent only applied to the text messages.

The nightmare scenario of the Fourth Amendment, which protects Americans from unreasonable searches and seizures, is that the government will give officers “unbridled discretion to rummage at will among a person’s private effects.”

Copying a person’s entire cellphone and sharing it with other law enforcement agencies seems to match that scenario.

Can a suspect’s consent be limited?

One of the big questions in this case is whether Mr. Burch granted only limited access to the Green Bay officer. He says he only consented to a review of his text messages. Was that limit effective?

It’s important because, according to an investigation by Upturn, police routinely use consent instead of getting warrants to extract and copy cellphone contents.

In Harris County, Texas, between August 2015 and July 2019, for example, officers conducted 53% of phone extraction searches without warrants. Generally, they claimed the suspect had consented or that the phone was abandoned. Similar findings have been noted nationwide.

Consent searches are troubling, in part because the consent is often obtained under pressure. Who would consent to having their entire phone copied and saved for later use against them?

Archives

FindLaw Network

“I just want to say thank you for the outstanding work you have done for him and let you know how much we appreciate the time and attention you gave to his case. We are obviously overjoyed by today’s dismissal!” (Child pornography case dismissed after motion to suppress was granted)”

“After having had time to exhale, we thank each one of you and all the others who contributed to the exemplary Supreme Court presentation. We are proud of your efforts on our behalf and, equally important, on behalf of the many present and future defendants statewide.” (Client’s comment after Supreme Court oral argument)

“Thank you. Thank you. I am so pleased to hear that we won. It doesn’t seem that it was even a close call. I appreciate your efforts.” (Oconto County defendant after Buting, Williams & Stilling got his prison sentence overturned in the court of appeals) ”

“Your time and advice was appreciated more than words can express at a time when we really needed someone to guide us.” (Client)

“The outcome was amazing, one unavailable even under identical circumstances in probably 98 percent of federal courtrooms around the country. Separate and apart from the outcome, though, I am supremely impressed by your efforts on your client’s behalf. Your comments in support of the requested sentence were perfect in tone and, having now reviewed the extensive sentencing memorandum you filed, your work in that regard was exemplary as well. Your client was certainly fortunate to have you as his attorney.” (Local federal court attorney present at a sentencing)

“I can’t thank you enough, not only for all of the tireless work that you and your staff put into my case, but for telling me what I needed to hear, at a time when I absolutely had to hear it. I consider myself blessed for everything turning out the way it did, especially since I blindly picked you out of a phone book! You helped me, my family and friends in many more ways than the money ever could.” (Child pornography client)

“I think you will find that in any circles where Kathy’s name is raised, people will always respond positively and identify her as an extremely hardworking, knowledgeable and ethical lawyer who is timely and effective with any endeavor she takes on. These circles would include colleagues, friends, prosecutors, judges, professors and others who have crossed paths with Kathy. They would also include the many lawyers like me who have referred numerous cases to Kathy, invariably with positive feedback from the clients regarding her knowledge of their case, empathy, professionalism and fair-mindedness in addressing their concerns.” (Fellow attorney)

“Thank you for giving [our son] back to us. Wonderful work!” (Family of client accused of armed robbery after charges were dismissed)

“Yes, His perfect time and perfect place, you were a part of this plan. I almost didn’t hire you, but I took a step of faith trusting Him and look what happened? Praise God. Our Lord put you in your vocation for a reason, continue to help those He brings your way. May He bless you in ALL you do!” (Client who was wrongfully convicted of sexual assault in a northwestern Wisconsin county. He was released from prison after attorneys got his conviction reversed.)

“I really cannot thank you enough for your past help. You really know your stuff. It is actually funny when I think about my other past attorney’s knowledge and then when I talk with you. It’s like night and day. You’re like a walking book of knowledge with a purpose-driven life. Thanks.” (Brown County client of attorney Buting)

“A year later and I still believe your defense is the single best example of lawyering I have ever seen.” (Television reporter commenting on attorney Buting’s defense of Steven Avery)

“You have a certain brilliance that makes me sure that when you talk, it is good information and I am in good hands. You tell it to me like it is even when the things you say are not always the things that I would like to hear. You keep it REAL!!!” (Brown County client)

“Thank you, thank you, thank you! I feel like this was one of the biggest blessings that happened in my life. I put this along with my children being born healthy and when I survived that horrific shooting. I appreciate everything you have done for me. I couldn’t ask for better lawyers. I want to say thank you to everybody at your firm. I owe you more than the fee you so rightfully deserve. … You gave me back hope. Thank you, man! Out of my 36 years … I have never seen such kindness before. I don’t know what I did to deserve this; I’m very thankful nonetheless. Thank you for giving me hope again. Thank you for your generosity. There are still some really good people around.” (Federal criminal appeal client)

“There is no other attorney I’ve ever even heard of I’d rather have as chief counsel and leader of my defense/appeals than Jerome Buting. You’re the best. Period.” (Dane County client)

“Your advice and counsel were greatly appreciated. We appreciate you taking the time on your Sunday and evenings to help us. We are SO happy about the results! Thanks again.” (Waukesha County client)

“Thank you again … for everything. Five and one-half years of commitment, so many ups and downs and an outcome like that. You did a GREAT job.” (Waukesha County felony drug offense client)