Buting ,Williams & Stilling ,S.C. | A Criminal Defense Law Firm

Call Today for a FREE Consultation

262-923-8761

24 HOUR EMERGENCY CONTACT

Richard Glossip didn’t do it and we know who did. Why is he on death row?

On Behalf of | Sep 27, 2022 | Wrongful Convictions

In January 1997, Justin Sneed murdered an Oklahoma motel owner named Barry Van Treese. He has admitted as much.

In exchange for more favorable treatment, Sneed agreed to implicate and testify against Richard Glossip, the motel’s manager. The prosecution’s theory was that Richard had been embezzling from the motel and that Van Treese had come to fire him. Richard, they claimed, therefore coerced Sneed to murder Van Treese in exchange for a share of the motel’s receipts.

Based largely on Sneed’s testimony, Richard was convicted and sentenced to death.

Now, it seems obvious to Richard’s lawyers that there has been a grave miscarriage of justice. The case was never properly investigated. The police appear to have jumped to the conclusion that Richard was embezzling from the motel based on very thin evidence. For example, they never even interviewed Van Treese’s wife, who did the books for the motel.

They seemed to leap to the conclusion that Richard was a criminal who coerced 19-year-old Sneed into committing the murder. They interviewed very few witnesses. In at least one case, when a witness came forward to challenge their narrative, she was told to leave town or she would face arrest.

If the police investigation was flawed, the prosecution didn’t seem to care, according to an investigative report by the Intercept. They ignored holes in the police’s theory and sought the death penalty despite obvious weaknesses in their own case.

Richard’s attorneys for his first trial failed to challenge much of the prosecution’s case.

In 2001, finding that Richard had not received adequate counsel, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals ordered a new trial.

A second jury found him guilty in 2004.

Richard’s current lawyers, however, have discovered significant new evidence. For one thing, Sneed wrote a series of letters to Richard’s former lawyer that seem to indicate he wanted to recant his story.

Later, two separate men who had spent time in jail with Sneed reported that Sneed had boasted that he killed Van Treese and let Richard take the fall.

Also, Richard’s lawyers discovered that, between his first and second trials, the prosecution had explicitly ordered 10 boxes of evidence to be destroyed. That evidence? For one thing, the books from the motel, which Richard needed to prove he hadn’t been embezzling.

Ultimately, there simply isn’t any reliable evidence pointing to Richard as involved in the murder.

A major independent review of Richard’s case in 2022 found that Richard’s second trial was so flawed that it “cannot be relied upon to support a murder-for-hire conviction. Nor can it provide a basis for the government to take the live of Richard E. Glossip.”

So, why is Richard still on death row?

Archives

FindLaw Network

“I just want to say thank you for the outstanding work you have done for him and let you know how much we appreciate the time and attention you gave to his case. We are obviously overjoyed by today’s dismissal!” (Child pornography case dismissed after motion to suppress was granted)”

“After having had time to exhale, we thank each one of you and all the others who contributed to the exemplary Supreme Court presentation. We are proud of your efforts on our behalf and, equally important, on behalf of the many present and future defendants statewide.” (Client’s comment after Supreme Court oral argument)

“Thank you. Thank you. I am so pleased to hear that we won. It doesn’t seem that it was even a close call. I appreciate your efforts.” (Oconto County defendant after Buting, Williams & Stilling got his prison sentence overturned in the court of appeals) ”

“Your time and advice was appreciated more than words can express at a time when we really needed someone to guide us.” (Client)

“The outcome was amazing, one unavailable even under identical circumstances in probably 98 percent of federal courtrooms around the country. Separate and apart from the outcome, though, I am supremely impressed by your efforts on your client’s behalf. Your comments in support of the requested sentence were perfect in tone and, having now reviewed the extensive sentencing memorandum you filed, your work in that regard was exemplary as well. Your client was certainly fortunate to have you as his attorney.” (Local federal court attorney present at a sentencing)

“I can’t thank you enough, not only for all of the tireless work that you and your staff put into my case, but for telling me what I needed to hear, at a time when I absolutely had to hear it. I consider myself blessed for everything turning out the way it did, especially since I blindly picked you out of a phone book! You helped me, my family and friends in many more ways than the money ever could.” (Child pornography client)

“I think you will find that in any circles where Kathy’s name is raised, people will always respond positively and identify her as an extremely hardworking, knowledgeable and ethical lawyer who is timely and effective with any endeavor she takes on. These circles would include colleagues, friends, prosecutors, judges, professors and others who have crossed paths with Kathy. They would also include the many lawyers like me who have referred numerous cases to Kathy, invariably with positive feedback from the clients regarding her knowledge of their case, empathy, professionalism and fair-mindedness in addressing their concerns.” (Fellow attorney)

“Thank you for giving [our son] back to us. Wonderful work!” (Family of client accused of armed robbery after charges were dismissed)

“Yes, His perfect time and perfect place, you were a part of this plan. I almost didn’t hire you, but I took a step of faith trusting Him and look what happened? Praise God. Our Lord put you in your vocation for a reason, continue to help those He brings your way. May He bless you in ALL you do!” (Client who was wrongfully convicted of sexual assault in a northwestern Wisconsin county. He was released from prison after attorneys got his conviction reversed.)

“I really cannot thank you enough for your past help. You really know your stuff. It is actually funny when I think about my other past attorney’s knowledge and then when I talk with you. It’s like night and day. You’re like a walking book of knowledge with a purpose-driven life. Thanks.” (Brown County client of attorney Buting)

“A year later and I still believe your defense is the single best example of lawyering I have ever seen.” (Television reporter commenting on attorney Buting’s defense of Steven Avery)

“You have a certain brilliance that makes me sure that when you talk, it is good information and I am in good hands. You tell it to me like it is even when the things you say are not always the things that I would like to hear. You keep it REAL!!!” (Brown County client)

“Thank you, thank you, thank you! I feel like this was one of the biggest blessings that happened in my life. I put this along with my children being born healthy and when I survived that horrific shooting. I appreciate everything you have done for me. I couldn’t ask for better lawyers. I want to say thank you to everybody at your firm. I owe you more than the fee you so rightfully deserve. … You gave me back hope. Thank you, man! Out of my 36 years … I have never seen such kindness before. I don’t know what I did to deserve this; I’m very thankful nonetheless. Thank you for giving me hope again. Thank you for your generosity. There are still some really good people around.” (Federal criminal appeal client)

“There is no other attorney I’ve ever even heard of I’d rather have as chief counsel and leader of my defense/appeals than Jerome Buting. You’re the best. Period.” (Dane County client)

“Your advice and counsel were greatly appreciated. We appreciate you taking the time on your Sunday and evenings to help us. We are SO happy about the results! Thanks again.” (Waukesha County client)

“Thank you again … for everything. Five and one-half years of commitment, so many ups and downs and an outcome like that. You did a GREAT job.” (Waukesha County felony drug offense client)